What´s the deal?

Minister Koenders and EbrimaAre we going to have a deal tonight? All that is left to do for the Project Survival NL team is wait and hope. While it is crunch time for the world leaders inside the Bella Center to rack out a credible climate deal, we cannot do much more than keep a close eye on the news with our fingers crossed.

The picture was totally different earlier this week: we had our hands full with all sorts of exciting events. Our second week at the COP15 started with a definite highlight. On Monday morning part of the team had a meeting with the Dutch Ministers of Environment and Development Cooperation, Jaqueline Cramer and Bert Koenders. Together with them and the Dutch youth representatives we discussed our project and the Dutch youth statements. It was an interesting meeting and informal meeting in which both Ministers expressed their sympathy for the project and agreed that youth participation is a very important issue in climate change talks. It was not only the Dutch part of the group that got to speak to their Ministers, also our African youth delegates met various Ministers. A few of them got opportunities to prepare speeches and briefings for their Ministers.

The beginning of the week was however not all fun and games for everyone. A few of our project members spent most of Monday out in the cold due to poor organisation. It also soon became clear that due to new restrictions many people with NGO badges would not be able to enter the Bella Center anymore as of Tuesday. Luckily most of the African youth delegates had a Party badge, but a number of us would not be able to get in anymore. We had a number of secondary badges for Tuesday and Wednesday but from Thursday onwards our whole team has been moving between various makeshift offices in the alternative fora in town. The last couple of days we spent trying to attract some media attention, following the talks on various screens and just taking a break from the hassle at the Bella Center.

Now, as the final official hours of the conference have arrived (it looks like the talks are going to be lengthened though) we have some time to reflect on what we did and I think we can be proud. Proud of our little project and the fact that we made it to Copenhagen, but even more proud of work that Ebrima, Ezilon, Margaret, Matildah, Mangaliso, Hubert, Claude, Mahawa and Matias have been able to do for their countries. Now it is up to Obama, Jiabao, Reinfeldt and co to make us proud of being part of humanity! Whatever the outcome, we’re off for a good African dinner with our team before we split up again and spread out over precious globe.  The food will taste a whole lot better knowing that everyone´s survival will be guaranteed though!

Copenhague Plan B : «protégeons les riches» !

La séance plénière de la conférence des parties pour le protocole de Kyoto a été ajournée le 16 decembre. Le point d’achoppement essentiel est le statut du texte final de la conférence.

La journée du 9 décembre avait été marquée par la connaissance du projet de texte du Danemark, qui pourrait être le résultat majeur de la conférence. Ce texte, élaboré dans le secret (les rumeurs circulaient depuis plusieurs jours sur son existence), viole les principes démocratiques des Nations Unies et enterre le protocole de Kyoto, tout comme la convention de Rio sur les changements climatiques.

Il propose des contraintes de réduction pour l’ensemble des pays, sauf les plus pauvres, en contadiction avec le protocole de Kyoto qui n’engage que les pays industrialisés de l’Annexe 1. Les financements et les transferts technologiques, qui sont les piliers de la convention sur les changements climatiques, seraient désormais conditionnels. C’est un texte qui selon le G77 «protège les pays riches». Les engagements financiers proposés sont très faibles ; en revanche figure l’engagement à développer les marchés du carbone. La connaissance du texte a provoqué une manifestation spontanée dans le Bella Center, des représentants de la Pan African Climate Justice Alliance.

Dans la séance plénière, les pays du Sud étaient très offensifs, unis pour demander de rester dans le cadre du protocole, et les pays du Nord, en particulier suite à l’intervention de l’Australie apparaissent comme des rentiers qui défendent un texte qui les protège et qui ont perdu toute intelligence de la situation. Devant leur détermination à voir prendre en compte leurs propositions sans attendre, la présidente a préféré ajourner la plénière….

Présentation de la plate-forme bolivienne pour «les droits de la terre-mère». Bella Center.

(quelques interventions à la tribune de représentants du gouvernement)

«Si vous nous demandez si nous voulons vivre comme des américains ou des européens, la réponse est non. Non pas parce que nous ne les aimons pas, mais parce que leur mode de développement est insoutenable. Voilà pourquoi nous devons changer de système. Il faut délivrer la «mère-terre» de l’esclavage. On doit trouver un équilibre entre les humains et la nature».

Ici, dans cette réunion, c’est l’endroit où on discute les vrais solutions.

Jour international de la mère terre, 22 avril : «Nous voulons construire un mouvement, un mouvement global pour les droits de «la terre mère» avec les peuples indigènes, les mouvements sociaux, les ONG, les mouvements écologistes, les chercheurs, les États».

Table ronde au Klimaforum

Ecological debt, Climate change and human and nature rights

Dette écologique, changement climatique, droits humains et droits de la nature

Compte-rendu partiel de quelques interventions

Elizabeth Peredo, Fundacion Solon, Bolivia

Nécessité de changer de paradigme. Nous venons de la terre et nous y retournerons. Vivre bien, vivre en harmonie, ce sont les racines que nous voulons développer. Nous ne voulons pas vivre plus, nous voulons «vivre bien» et en harmonie avec les autres peuples. Le gouvernement de Bolivie a posé dans l’agenda de l’ONU, les droits de la mère-terre. Nous proposons aussi la construction d’un tribunal sur la justice climatique.

C’est suite à la seconde guerre mondiale, après «l’holocauste» qu’ont été réaffirmés les droits humains. Aujourd’hui, c’est un génocide silencieux qui exige de poser les droits de la mère-terre.

Ibrahim Koulibali, Via Campesina, Mali.

Au Mali, le changement climatique est là. C’est une réalité qui sévit au quotidien depuis trente ans, avec la perturbation des saisons. C’est la vie des hommes et femmes qui est en jeu. Le désert avance. Mais on assiste aujourd’hui à l’émergence du nouveau business, et à la marchandisation de la terre et des forêts. La dette établit les responsabilités, et ceux qui sont responsables doivent changer de système. Les riches vont continuer à polluer car ils ont l’argent pour payer. Les victimes vont continuer à mourir.

Percy Makombe- Economic Justice Network (South Africa)

Nous sommes devant une crise de civilisation. Nous ne sommes pas seulement victimes nous sommes aussi partie prenante dès lors que nous avons abdiqué notre droit et notre devoir de penser. La responsabilité de la crise climatique revient aux pays du Nord. Les pays industrialisés, après avoir colonisé les terres, les mers, colonisent l’air avec le marché du carbone. On donne des droits de propriété sur l’air qu’on respire. Il faut supprimer les brevets sur les technologies propres. Le climat est un bien public. Il faut revoir le paradigme de la consommation et de la croissance.

Ivonne Yanez-Oilwatch Americas (Ecuador)

Le changement climatique est en train de devenir une idéologie. Bien sûr il y a un changement climatique. L’idélogie du changement climatique suppose «l’adaptation» et non la transformation du système. Cette idéologie promeut le marché, le marché carbone, les CDM, le REDD, c’est une «shock doctrine», comme le dit Naomi Klein.

Il faut construire une ére de l’après-pétrole, qui permette l’émancipation. Nous avons à étendre la constitution de l’Equateur, qui reconnaît des droits pour les ressources naturelles.

Vigil at the Twilight of Copenhagen

Clayton from the Indigenous caucus performing at vigil, photo by Kris Krug

Clayton from the Indigenous caucus performing at vigil, photo by Kris Krug

I just came back from an earth-shaking vigil tonight in Copenhagen. This is the twilight of my time here– with only one day left in the conference, nothing seemed to come of it. It has seemed to fail. Many of us organizers have also started to lose hope that any fair and binding agreement will come out of this process.

Yesterday, I witnessed my good friend, Joshua Kahn-Russel of the Rainforest Action Network, get bludgeoned in the face by police officers. He, along with the rest of us, weren’t trying to get into the Bella Center. We weren’t compromising the safety of World leaders inside. We just wanted to access the street across the bridge, where those who could not get into the center were waiting for us. Where we would have converged, we were going to hold a “People’s Assembly,” to create the kind of treaty that we would have wanted to come from our leaders.

But, the police would not let us cross that bridge. We attempted to negotiate with them. They told us that if we were to pass, we would risk arrest down the line. We accepted this, and attempted to walk past them. But, they blocked the way, and started beating those they could reach. After a while of scuffling, we started to retreat. As we did, they circled around the activists in the front, trapping them. They started to wail down on them gratuitously.

This is when the conference rules stopped becoming about “protecting the safety of those inside the Bella Center,” but more about preserving power. In a larger sense, I think it showed how scared the elites are of us: They simply would not let us assemble, even though at this point we were far from the center.

After half of the public transportation shut down to impede Copenhagen’s visitors without private limos to access the center, we have escalated our tactics. Not with violence, but with peace.

This is why I fasted today. More generally, like most of those fasting today with me, it was to fast in solidarity with those who can not access food. This is not only due to climate change in itself, but the corrupt food system, which is making it more and more difficult for people on both sides of the equation to find something nourishing to their bodies in the midst of “development.”

But I also fasted because as an “observer” here at Copenhagen, I had run out of ideas. Nothing else seemed important enough or effective enough to do at this juncture.

The police have attempted to take away our rights. The city and the UN process has taken away our access, barring us from the process. But this in itself says something. It shows they are threatened, that they are scared, and that we are a voice to be reckoned with.

The failure of Copenhagen, like what was said at the vigil, is not a complete failure. They have not won. We have succeeded in shifting the power so that those vulnerable to the decisions of the rich and powerful have been elevated: this time their voice was heard by the world, loud and clear. People like President Mohammud Nasheed of the Maldives have helped strengthen the youth movement in this way, by lending us his voice and giving us hope in the possibility of leadership.

Copenhagen may be a failure, but if we can keep our strength up until the end, we will have gained some ground in this battle for humanity. My love and gratitude goes out to everyone that is here with me, and all over the world, striving everyday to make it a better place.

(Photo credit: Kris Krug)

Get Involved

Want to get email updates?

Want to join a team, become a mentor, or just stay informed about the Project?

Contact Shadia

Donate

Support Project Survival Media today.

Donate now

Your tax-deductible donation provides critical support for our vital work to produce an equitable and bold policy on Climate Change.